Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 Cal. App. 444 - People v. Hunter

59 Cal. App. 444 - People v. Hunter’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 1950
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1950

5 state decisions

201922193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Lang

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The testimony and statements made by the appellant in his attempt to account for the possession of the stolen goods were of such character as to in themselves afford evidence of guilt, and the case in its facts is brought clearly within the ruling made in People v. Lang, 142 Cal. 484 [76 Pac. 232], What is said in the opinion rendered in that ease furnishes ample support to the respondent’s position here. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.