Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 CALAPP2D 585 - People v. Thomas

People v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
May 2000
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2000

16 state decisions

401943195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Warren · People v. Majors · People v. Coltrin · People v. McDaniels · 55 Cal. App. 2d 322 - People v. McIlvain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While the law jealously protects a culprit from double punishment, it does not allow him to commit two separate and distinct offenses for the price of one . . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “be had for more than one offense committed by means of a single act or series of acts, where there is an element of one crime not found in the other.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Defendants pleaded guilty to the charge of assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury (Count II), and not guilty to the charge of robbery (Count I). When placed on trial for the latter crime they interposed a plea of once in jeopardy and at the conclusion of their trial moved to dismiss the robbery charge, upon the grounds of former conviction and former jeopardy. The motions were denied, defendants were found guilty of robbery and were sentenced for each crime, to state prison for the crime of robbery and to the county jail for the assault, the sentences to run concurrently. All of them have appealed from the conviction of robbery.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.