People v. Beilfuss’s Empirical Analysis
1943
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently April 2009 · most notably People v. Fujita (1974), 69 Cal. App. 2d 503 - People v. Chait (1945)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Mayen · People v. Foster · People v. Gonzales · People v. Wynn · People v. Martin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘‘ The eases contain no clear definitions of these terms, but to bring an object within either, there must, of necessity, be something false about it. A writing which is genuine and contains no false statements of fact cannot be a ‘false token or writing.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Katcher
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.