Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 CALAPP2D 840 - Wiley v. Wiley

Wiley v. Wiley’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
March 1995
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently March 1995 · most notably 251 Cal. App. 2d 303 - Custodio v. Bauer (1967), 145 Cal. App. 3d 228 - Martin v. Kehl (1983)

4 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

140194319501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Millar v. Millar · Bradley Co. v. Bradley · 107 Cal. App. 532 - Germo Manufacturing Co. v. McClellan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is not every wrongful act, nor even every fraud, which prevents a suitor in equity from obtaining relief. His conduct must be so intimately connected to the injury of another with the matter for which he seeks relief, as to make it inequitable to accord him such relief. It must have been conduct which, if permitted, inequitably affects the relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant, . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is settled that the act upon which equity may refuse relief to a plaintiff because he does not come into court with clean hands must prejudicially affect the rights of the person against whom the relief is sought so that it would be inequitable to grant such relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.