¶1This cause is before us on error to the Court of Appeals which affirmed the judgment. 25 Colo. App. 122, 136 Pac. 804.
¶2Eor the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court of' Appeals, we think the judgment was rightly affirmed.
¶3 Affirmed.
59 Colo. 589
Decided April 15, 1915
Supreme Court of Colorado · decided 1915-04-15
<p> Error to the Court of Appeals. </p>
Relies on Ryan v. Geigel
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1915-04-15
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 1987
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1This cause is before us on error to the Court of Appeals which affirmed the judgment. 25 Colo. App. 122, 136 Pac. 804.
¶2Eor the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court of' Appeals, we think the judgment was rightly affirmed.
¶3 Affirmed.