Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 CONNAPP 481 - Fiddelman v. Redmon

Fiddelman v. Redmon’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crest Pontiac Cadillac, Inc. v. Hadley · Sadlowski v. Town of Manchester · Domestic Violence Services of Greater New Haven, Inc. v. Freedom of Information Commission · Sobocinski v. Freedom of Information Commission · Fiddelman v. Redmon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A case becomes moot when due to intervening circumstances a controversy between the parties no longer exists.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If there is no longer an actual controversy in which [this court] can afford practical relief to the parties, we must dismiss the appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Since mootness implicates subject matter jurisdiction . . . it can be raised at any stage of the proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.