Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 CUSTCT 753 - Wits v. United States

Wits v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
May 1978
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Brechner · 46 Cust. Ct. 788 - United States v. Gitkin Co. · Lollytogs, Ltd. v. United States · Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United States · Shalom v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * I always made sure that the mills understood that the purchaser in all cases was Knit Wits in California because we could not take the risk of being responsible for any refusal of the goods on the part of Knit Wits merely on a 5% commission. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * We are not working with you like traders with a profit permitting us to support all these changes, but we are working as your agents on a commission basis, and we cannot support any debit in any case. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “1. You have nominated us as your exclusive Buying Agents for Italy working on 5% (Five percent) commission basis for all direct or indirect orders that you will place in Italy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.