¶1In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of parts of debarking machines similar in all material respects to those the subject of Soderhamn Machine Mfg. Co. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 369, Abstract 69205), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
59 Cust. Ct. 882
Soderhamn Machine Manufacturing Co. v. United States
Decided July 1, 1967
United States Customs Court · decided 1967-07-01
Relies on Soderhamn Machine Mfg. Co. v. United States
Decided 1967-07-01