Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 F.1d 765 - In re Rosenwald

In re Rosenwald’s Empirical Analysis

59 F. 765 · 1894

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
March 1895
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Arthur v. Unkart · Sampson v. Peaslee · In re Blumlein

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““246. Leaf tobacco, of which eighty-five per cent, is of the requisite size anfi of the necessary fineness of texture to be suitable for wrappers, and of which more than one hundred leaves are required to weigh a pound, Bif not stemmed, seventy-five cents per pound.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““247. All other tobacco in leaf, unmanufactured and not stemmed, thirty-five cents per pound.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.