Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 F.2d 173 - Coates v. United States

Coates v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

59 F.2d 173 · 1932

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
3
states following
September 1981
most recently cited

48 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently September 1981 · most notably United States v. Roselli (1970), Hernandez v. United States (1962)

48 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

160193219401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hagner v. United States · Hyde v. United States · Ford v. United States · Rosen v. United States · Cochran v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If a witness disobeys the order of withdrawal, while he may be proceeded against for contempt and his testimony is open to comment to the jury by reason of his conduct, he is not thereby disqualified, and the weight of authority is that he cannot be excluded on that ground merely, although the right to exclude under particular circumstances may be supported as within the sound discretion of the trial court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.