Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 F.2d 242 - Backus v. United States

Backus v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

59 F.2d 242 · 1932

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
February 1982
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently February 1982 · most notably Boulez v. Commissioner (1981), Joyce v. Gentsch (1944)

18 federal appellate · 3 district ·

220193219401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 1244 · 26 U.S.C. § 1249

Relies on Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner · Botany Worsted Mills v. United States · Dickerson v. Colgrove · Hennessy v. Bacon · Clark v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “SEC. 7122. COMPROMISES. (a) Authorization. — The Secretary or his delegate may compromise any civil or criminal case arising under the internal revenue laws prior to reference to the Department of Justice for prosecution or defense; and the Attorney General or his delegate may compromise any such case after reference to the Department of Justice for prosecution or defense. (b) Record. — Whenever a compromise is made by the Secretary or his delegate in any case, there shall be placed on file in the office of the Secretary or his delegate the opinion of the General Counsel for the Department of the Treasury or his delegate, with his reasons therefor, with a statement of— (1) The amount of tax assessed, (2) The amount of interest, additional amount, addition to the tax, or assessable penalty, imposed by law on the person against whom the tax is assessed, and (3) The amount actually paid in accordance with the terms of the compromise. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this subsection, no such opinion shall be required with respect to the compromise of any civil case in which the unpaid amount of tax assessed (including any interest, additional amount, addition to the tax, or assessable penalty) is less than $500.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““It is further stipulated and agreed that the understatement of the amount of the taxable "net income as shown by the returns filed by the taxpayer herein for each of the taxable years 1917, 1918, 1919, and 1920 was due to negligence on the part of the taxpayer but without intent to defraud.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.