Snead v. Elmore’s Empirical Analysis
59 F.2d 312 · 1932
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently February 2009 · most notably Carmack v. Scofield (1953), Bass v. Hawley (1933)
26 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co. · Tucker v. Alexander · Hellmich v. Hellman · Kings Co Sav Inst v. Blair · Red Wing Malting Co. v. Willcuts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * This does not mean that the claim for refund must have contained all the evidence or argument that is offered in the suit, but it must have indicated not only the amount claimed but the substantial grounds on which illegality is asserted and the general facts supporting the grounds, so that they may be fully investigated.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.