Hoover v. Wardman

District of Columbia District Court

Argued April 11, 1932.

Decided May 31, 1932.

Motion for Rehearing Denied June 10, 1932.

District of Columbia District Court · decided 1932-05-31

2 counsel of record

Relies on Cafritz Const. Co. v. Mudrick

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1932-05-31

¶1Thos. Morton Gittings, of Washington, D. C., for appellants.

¶2Daniel Thew Wright, of Washington, D. C., for appellees.

¶3 *867Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB, VAN ORSDEL, and GRONER, Associate Justices.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This ease was argued and submitted together with Cafritz Construction Co. v. Robert Mudrick and Fredy Mudrick, 61 App. D. C. 189, 59 F.(2d) 864, and involves the same issue this day decided by us therein. Consistently with our decision in that ease, the judgment of the lower court herein is reversed with costs, and this canse is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

¶6ROBB, Associate Justice, dissents.