Durfey’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2020
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kearing v. Teel · Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb Litigation Brown v. Monsanto Company · Belmont International, Inc. v. American International Shoe Co. · Warner v. Ohio · Nike, Inc. v. Comercial Iberica de Exclusivas Deportivas, S.A.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Congress intentionally deleted all personal rights to recovery of medical expenses from CERCLA.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“necessary to monitor, assess, and evaluate the release or threat of release of hazardous substances ... or the taking of such other actions as may be necessary to prevent, minimize, or mitigate damage to the public health or welfare.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the ATSDR is only required to administer a 'health surveillance' (medical monitoring) program if the ATSDR Administrator has determined that there is a significantly increased risk for an affected population.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.