Caruth v. International Psychoanalytical Ass'n’s Empirical Analysis
59 F.3d 126 · 1995
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 15 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently October 2023 · most notably Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Robertson-Ceco Corp. (1996), Panavision International, L.P. v. Toeppen (1998)
17 federal appellate · 15 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty. · Data Disc, Inc. v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc. · Sher v. Johnson · Haisten v. Grass Valley Medical Reimbursement Fund, Ltd.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“inquire[s] into whether [the plaintiff's] pleadings and affidavits make a prima facie showing of personal jurisdiction.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`inconvenience is so great as to constitute a deprivation of due process[.]'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“California maintains a strong interest in providing an effective means of redress for its residents [who are] tortiously injured.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.