Rise’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
8 district · 50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably State v. Maass (2003), 219 Ill. 2d 104 - People v. Garvin (2006)
8 district · 50 state decisions — followed in 25 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Katz v. United States · Bell v. Wolfish · Schmerber v. State of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[EJveryday 'booking' procedures routinely require even the merely accused to provide fingerprint identification, regardless of whether the investigation of the crime involves fingerprint evidence ... Once a per son is convicted of one of the felonies included as predicate offenses under [the statute], his identity has become a matter of state interest and he has lost any legitimate expectation of privacy in the identifying information derived from the blood sampling.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]hat the gathering of DNA information requires the drawing of blood rather than inking and rolling a person's fingertips does not elevate the intrusion upon the plaintiffs' Fourth Amendment interests to a level beyond minimal.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“only if they play an affirmative part in the alleged deprivation of constitutional rights.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.