Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

59 F.3d 166

Docket No. 95-1351.

Conboy v. Kelly

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: May 18, 1995. Decided: June 20, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-06-20

Relies on Davis v. Waters McI

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-06-20

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Thomas J. Conboy, Appellant Pro Se. James Patrick Gillece, Jr., MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, Baltimore, MD; James F. Horne, BOYCE, HORNE & JONES, L.C., St. Louis, MO, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his amended complaint on the basis of improper venue. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Conboy v. Kelly, No. CA-93-4148-B (D. Md. Feb. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/59/f3d/166 · .json · Public domain