Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

59 F.3d 166

Docket No. 95-6408.

Kay Frances Gibbs v. State of North Carolina

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted May 18, 1995. Decided June 27, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-06-27

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2106 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Davis v. Waters McI

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-06-27

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Kay Frances Gibbs, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant a certificate of probable cause to appeal and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gibbs v. North Carolina, No. CA-95-1014-5-HC (E.D.N.C. Feb. 13, 1995; Mar. 1, 1995). However, because the Appellant may refile her petition upon the exhaustion of state remedies, we modify the judgment to be a dismissal without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2106 (1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

/59/f3d/166 · .json · Public domain