Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

59 F.3d 168

Docket No. 95-6347.

United States v. Warrix

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted May 18, 1995. Decided June 26, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-06-26

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Ward

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-06-26

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Kenneth Warrix, Appellant Pro Se. Sanford Benjamin Bryant, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, WV, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion and his motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59. We have reviewed the district court's opinions and orders, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Warrix, Nos. CR88-191; CA-93-311-3 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 16, 1994, Oct. 7, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/59/f3d/168 · .json · Public domain