Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 F.3d 327 - Prudential Lines Inc Dicola Pli v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association Inc

Prudential Lines Inc Dicola Pli v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association Inc’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
December 2013
most recently cited

2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently December 2013 · most notably Arochem Corporation Na v. M Coan, In Re Dennis Leroy Saxman (2003)

2 district ·

160199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · Swint v. Chambers County Commission · Relford v. Commandant, U. S. Disciplinary Barracks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[b]ecause bankruptcy proceedings often continue for long periods of time, and discrete claims are often resolved at various times over the course of the proceedings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “mere[ ] competing contentions with respect to separable issues”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Given the strong federal policy against piecemeal appeals, a “dispute,” for ap-pealability purposes in the bankruptcy context, means at least an entire claim on which relief may be granted. Thus, with respect to a meritorious claim for damages, the dispute is not completely resolved until the bankruptcy court determines the amount of damages to be awarded- [T]he order need not resolve all of the issues raised by the bankruptcy; but it must completely resolve all of the issues pertaining to a discrete claim, including issues as to the proper relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.