Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 F.3d 58 - Vukadinovich v. McCarthy

Vukadinovich v. McCarthy’s Empirical Analysis

59 F.3d 58 · 1995

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably United International Holdings, Inc. v. Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. (2000), Wilson v. City of Chicago (1997)

20 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

1801995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Munson v. Friske · Continental Illinois Securities Litigation: Steinlauf v. Continental Illinois Corporation Much Shelist Freed Denenberg Ament & Eiger · Heiar v. Crawford County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The smaller the stakes, the less the required formality of proof. It would be absurd to require a litigant to incur a substantial expense in proving up a claim for only $816.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.