Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 F.3d 710 - Eversole v. Steele

Eversole v. Steele’s Empirical Analysis

59 F.3d 710 · 1995

Citation profile

91
cited by 91 later decisions
2
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 91 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Woods v. City of Chicago (2000), Humphrey v. Staszak (1998)

33 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

4101995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'(1) whether the plaintiff has asserted a violation of a federal constitutional right, and (2) whether the constitutional standards implicated were clearly established at the time in question.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in the hopes of uncovering potentially exculpatory evidence”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.