Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 FAPPX 709 - Kowalski v. Romano

Kowalski v. Romano’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
October 2018
most recently cited

2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 350 · 11 U.S.C. § 502 · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 528 (§ 229 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 726 · 11 U.S.C. § 727

Relies on In Re: Seymour Markowitz, Debtor. Seymour Markowitz v. Carolyn Campbell · United States v. Elder · Rosinski v. Boyd · Calvert Bay Area Factors Division of Dimmitt Owens Financial Inc v. Calvert · R.E. America, Inc. v. Garver

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[an omitted debt is not discharged] if such debt is of a kind specified in paragraph (2), (4), or (6) of this subsection, [and not scheduled in time to allow a] timely filing of a proof of claim and timely request for a determination of dischargeability of such debt under one of such paragraphs, unless such creditor had notice or actual knowledge of the case in time for such timely filing and request[.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The Sixth Circuit has held that a willful and malicious injury as defined under § 523(a)(6) is one where the debtor `desires to cause consequences of his act, or . . . believes that the consequences are substantially certain to result from it.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “An intentional or deliberate act alone does not constitute willful and malicious conduct under § 523(a)(6).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.