Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 FSUPP2D 47 - United States v. Klat

United States v. Klat’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
June 2000
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4241

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Klat · United States Bilyew v. Franzen · 346 F. Supp. 297 - McLaughlin v. Royster

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “provided reasonable cause to order a competency evaluation. Joint Appendix (JA), tab F, at 2. 4 Klat was then transferred to Carswell Medical Center in Fort Worth, Texas, where James A. Shadduck, a forensic psychologist, performed a competency evaluation. Klat was interviewed and otherwise examined by Shadduck and others who conducted”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “there is absolutely no evidence to give rise to the inference of a reasonable possibility that defendant would have acted in accordance with such advice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “no reasonable possibility that counsel could have affected the outcome of defendant's competency hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.