59 F. Supp. 3d 107 - Perlmutter v. Varone’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Mireles v. Waco · Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt · Lamont v. Haig · 944 F. Supp. 13 - Trout Unlimited v. United States Department of Agriculture
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[P]laintiffs must show that a considerable portion of the events took place in their chosen forum.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[n]othing in section 1391(b)(2) mandates that a plaintiff bring suit in the district where the most substantial portion of the relevant events occurred, nor does it require a plaintiff to establish that every event that supports an element of a claim occurred in the district where venue is sought.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.