Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 GAAPP 154 - Floyd v. Swift & Co.

Floyd v. Swift & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
June 2007
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2007

1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

4019381940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chenall v. Palmer Brick Co. · Payne v. Rome Coca-Cola Bottling Co. · Palmer Brick Co. v. Chenall · Sinkovitz v. Peters Land Co. · 5 Ga. App. 317 - Cochrell v. Langley Manufacturing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In arriving at a verdict, the jury, from facts proved, and sometimes from the absence of counter evidence, may infer the existence of other facts reasonably and logically consequent on those proved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.