¶1This is a proceeding in the nature of a writ of quo warranto.
¶2The motion to quash should have been sustained. The information does not run, “in the name and by the authority of the People of the State of Illinois,” as required by the constitution.
¶3These words can not be dispensed with. They constitute matter of substance, and advantage can be taken of their omission, in arrest or on error.
¶4This proceeding is a prosecution, and the language of the constitution must be used, as in indictments. Wright v. The People, 15 Ill. 417; Donnelly v. The People, 11 Ill. 552.
¶5The judgment is reversed.
¶6Judgment reversed.