Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 Ill. 2d 79 - Rios v. Niagara MacHine & Tool Works

59 Ill. 2d 79 - Rios v. Niagara MacHine & Tool Works’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

107
cited by 107 later decisions
3
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 96 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 107 later decisions — most recently September 2012 · most notably 97 Ill. 2d 104 - Coney v. J. L. G. Industries, Inc. (1983), 138 Ill. 2d 510 - Lamkin v. Towner (1990)

6 federal appellate · 96 state decisions

46019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 57 Ill. 2d 7 - Winnett v. Winnett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 107 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Since there is no evidence which causally connects the plaintiffs injury with the unreasonably dangerous condition of the machine alleged in the complaint he may therefore not recover * * * under the principles of strict tort liability.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.