Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 KAN 190 - Webb v. Branner

Webb v. Branner’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
March 1961
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 1961

9 state decisions

4018981900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cavender v. Roberson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It was shown that a fair price was obtained for the lot, but there being a manifest conflict between the duties of the trustee and his personal interests, the courts, for the purpose of removing all opportunity for fraud, generally hold such transfers to be void, whether they appear to be fair or not.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.