Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 KAN 313 - Barton v. Mulvane

Barton v. Mulvane’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
4
states following
March 1936
most recently cited

2 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 1936

2 district · 11 state decisions

6018981900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Raper v. Harrison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Obviously the legislature intended that parties engaged in .such an unlawful combination or trust should not use the law and its machinery to promote the unlawful combination or conspiracy, nor to enforce any agreement or contract growing out of it.” (p. 317.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.