Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 KAN 477 - Frame v. Ashley

Frame v. Ashley’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
4
states following
June 1950
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 1950

2 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

301898190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wey v. Schofield · Fuller v. Wells, Fargo & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The general rule is that a statutory obligation to pay damages which the common law does not give is ‘a liability created by statute,’ where the damages awarded are limited to compensation—limited to an amount which merely makes the injured person whole. The general rule also is that a statutory obligation to pay an amount beyond compensation, to submit to more than the simple redress of the wrong done, to pay not merely in respect of the deserts of the injured person but as punishment for the wrong done, is a penalty. Tested by these simple rules the case is easy of solution. The statutory obligation in question is a liability created by statute, because it is wholly limited to compensation. There is nothing of a penal character in the terms of the law which imposes the obligation. On the contrary, the statute and other enactments in pari materia clearly show that it was intended to be compensatory and not penal.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.