Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 KAN 640 - Smith v. Worster

Smith v. Worster’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
3
states following
July 1986
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently July 1986

2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

701898190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Holden v. Garrett · Grant v. Bennett · Utley v. Fee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““No such instrument in writing shall be valid, except as between the parties thereto and such as have actual notice thereof, until the same shall be deposited with the register of deeds for record.” Section 1672, Glen. St. Kan. 1909.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.