Callaghan v. Chipman’s Empirical Analysis
1886
Citation profile
1 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1939
1 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People ex rel. Drake v. Mahaney · People Ex Rel. City of Rochester v. Briggs · City of St. Louis v. Tiefel · The People v. . O'Brien · Hingle v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““The principal questions in each case will therefore be whether the act is broader than the title; and, if so, then whether the other objects in the act are so intimately connected with the one indicated by the title that the portion of the act relating to them cannot be rejected,, and leave a complete and sensible enactment which is capable of being executed.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.