Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 MICH 95 - Bumpus v. Bumpus

Bumpus v. Bumpus’s Empirical Analysis

1886

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 1935
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 1935

5 state decisions

20188618901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Campau v. Van Dyke · Campau v. Lafferty · Buck v. Sherman · Pogodzinski v. Kruger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The general rule is, where fraud is charged, that it must be clearly proved as alleged, and is not to be lightly inferred, and the party affected by it must complain promptly when the facts come to his knowledge.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.