Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 N.C. App. 298 - State v. Wilhelm

59 N.C. App. 298 - State v. Wilhelm’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2016

14 state decisions

801982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Payton v. New York · Wilson v. Omaha Indian Tribe · State v. Oliver · State v. Phillips · State v. Riera

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hen a random sample from a quantity of tablets or capsules identical in appearance is analyzed and found to contain contraband, the entire quantity may be introduced as the contraband.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is immaterial how the opinion is expressed, whether in the examination of a witness, in the rulings upon objections to evidence, or in any other manner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The judge may not express during any stage of the trial, any opinion in the presence of the jury on any question of fact to be decided by the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.