59 N.C. App. 38 - State v. Camp’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently November 2019
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Parker v. Levy · Houchins v. KQED, Inc. · State v. McKinney · State v. Duncan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]his conduct is not protected by the First Amendment and, therefore, [N.C. Gen.Stat. § ] 14-196(a)(3) which prohibits such unprotected conduct is not unconstitutionally overbroad.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“using telephones to annoy, offend, terrify or harass others and not directed at prohibiting the communication of thoughts or ideas.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“for the purpose of abusing, annoying, threatening, terrifying, harassing or embarrassing any person at the called number[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.