59 N.C. App. 389 - Boyles v. Boyles’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Frances Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Burlington Industries, Inc. · Thomas v. Frosty Morn Meats, Inc. · 113 So. 2d 547 - Kosch v. Kosch · 123 So. 2d 745 - Lendsay v. Cotton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the facts suggest at least one other inferencethat the appellant was on vacation or temporarily absent from the home at the time the notices were left.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Boyles v. Boyles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.