State v. Holmes’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2009
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Lovasco · Rabinovitch v. Nyquist · State v. Dietz · 46 N.C. App. 778 - State v. Davis · State v. Creech
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A general allegation of prejudice supported merely by claims of faded memory will not sustain the defendant’s burden of proof on the issue of prejudice. The defendant must show that the evidence or testimony lost because of faded memory would have been helpful, was significant and was lost because of pre-indictment delay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.