Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 NJL 504 - State v. Hudspeth

State v. Hudspeth’s Empirical Analysis

1896

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
July 2001
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2001

17 state decisions

50189619001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex parte Jennings · Commercial Bank v. Canal Commissioners · People v. Champion · People ex rel. Dikeman v. President & Trustees of Brooklyn · People v. Supervisors of the County of Ulster

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “At the common law a peremptory writ of mandamus was always awarded or denied on the return to the alternative writ. If the return was, on its face, insufficient, it was quashed and a peremptory writ was awarded. If the return was, on its face, sufficient, a peremptory writ was denied, unless the relator, by a separate action against the defendant to recover damages for making a false return, obtained a final judgment that the return was false and so vindicated his right to a peremptory writ. On an award of the writ in such proceedings error would not lie. * * * The same rule holds in New Jersey, when [where?] the common law procedure is followed. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “On December 2, 1794, a statute was passed in New Jersey extending to all cases the procedure described in 9 Anne, c. 20. ( Gen. St., p. 2000).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.