Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 N.M. 332 - Harbison v. Clark

Harbison v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2010

10 state decisions

401955196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chavez v. Potter · Crawford v. Holcomb

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It requires no strained construction to hold that the defendant has pleaded an express agreement.... And it is the rule that one may not plead an express contract and recover on an implied one.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.