59 Ohio App. 2d 187 - State v. Sanders’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““(A) Where the same conduct by defendant can be construed to constitute two or more allied offenses of similar import, the indictment or information may contain counts for all such offenses, but the defendant may be convicted of only one. “(B) Where the defendant’s conduct constitutes two or more offenses of dissimilar import, or where his conduct results in two or more offenses of the same or similar kind committed separately or with a separate animus as to each, the indictment or information may contain counts for all such offenses, and the defendant may be convicted of all of them.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 3 Ohio App. 3d 145 - State v. Cartellone

2. ““* * * the defendant, as a matter of law, cannot be convicted of four separate crimes of receiving stolen property, when he received the items at the same time, from the same source in the same transaction. While the state proved beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant is guilty of one count of receiving stolen property, they offered no evidence to show that defendant harbored a separate animus toward each individual owner * * *.” (Id. at 191.)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 3 Ohio App. 3d 145 - State v. Cartellone

3. “defendant had no knowledge of the number of thefts and received the property in a single continuous transaction from the same source at the same time.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Moyer v. Petty