Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 OHIOST3D 122 - State v. McGlone

State v. McGlone’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
2
states following
September 2022
most recently cited

44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently September 2022 · most notably 127 Ohio App. 3d 328 - State v. Long (1998), 121 Ohio App. 3d 162 - State v. Blanton (1997)

44 state decisions

2301991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Operation of a motor vehicle within the contemplation of the statute is a broader term than mere driving and a person in the driver’s position in the front seat with the ignition key in his possession indicating either his actual or potential movement of the vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or any drug of abuse can be found in violation of R.C. 4511.19(A).” (Emphasis added.)”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““R.C. 4511.19 is not only directed to those who drive on public streets. It prohibits the operation of a motor vehicle anywhere in the state while the driver is under the influence of drugs or alcohol. We agree with the dissent’s observation in the court of appeals that: ‘If you are under the influence [of alcohol or drugs], don’t drive or put yourself in a position of control of a vehicle. If you do, you pay the penalty.’ Had McGlone struck a car or a person in the driveway as a result of his intoxication, his conduct would have been no less reprehensible than if he had struck a person or another vehicle on the highway.” Id. at 124 , 570 N.E.2d at 1117 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[a]n intoxicated person who is in the driver's seat of a motor vehicle parked on private or public property with the key in the ignition is operating the vehicle in violation of R.C. 4511.19(A)(1).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.