State v. Schluer’s Empirical Analysis
1911
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 1983
2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Shaw · Straw v. Harris · Cook v. Port of Portland · Simon v. Northup · Toomy v. Dunphy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘ ‘ Corporations may be formed under general laws,, but shall not be created by the legislative assembly by special laws. The legislative assembly shall not enact, amend, or repeal any charter or act of incorporation for any municipality, city or town. The legal voters of every city and town are hereby granted power' to enact and amend their municipal charter, subject to the constitution and criminal laws of the State of Oregon. ’ ’”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Such subdivision of a county, or a precinct of a county, may embrace in its limits incorporated towns and cities and portions thereof, or may consist of the whole or a portion of an incorporated city or town.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Perkins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.