59 Or. App. 74 - State v. Bird’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
November 1995
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"the prejudice to a defendant shackled or otherwise physically restrained during trial is manifest and need not be proven in an individual case. By showing that he was required to wear leg shackles, without a showing of substantial necessity, defendant has demonstrated a violation of his due process right to a fair trial." Kessler, 57 Or.App. at 474-75 , 645 P.2d 1070 ; Bird, 59 Or.App. at 78, 650 P.2d 949 (quoting Kessler ) (emphasis supplied). [2]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“You have to start with the charge contained in the indictment * * * and you consider the [lesser included] charge * * * only if you should find the Defendant not guilty of the * * * [original charge].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tarwater v. Cupp
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.