¶1Appellant was convicted of the offense of grand larceny. A careful consideration of the record before us and the contentions of appellant fail to disclose any prejudicial error.
¶2The judgment and order appealed from are therefore affirmed.
59 S.D. 359
240 N.W 203
State v. McFarland
Decided January 16, 1932
South Dakota Supreme Court · decided 1932-01-16
Decided 1932-01-16