Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 S.D. 563 - Beveridge v. Baer

Beveridge v. Baer’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
5
states following
March 1983
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 1983

13 state decisions

40193219401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bi-Metallic Investment Company v. State Board of Equalization · Kuntz v. Sumption · People ex rel. Bracher v. Orvis · City of Beatrice v. Wright · Avant v. Flynn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`The law authorizing the proceedings must require notice or it will be unconstitutional. It is not enough that a person may by chance have notice, or that he may, as a matter of favor or courtesy, have a hearing.' 12 C.J. 1229.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.