59 So. 2d 511 - Simpson v. Goldworm’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"The Legislature has not, by general law, specifically authorized the municipalities of this state to regulate the `method of sale' of alcoholic beverages within their corporate limits; and this court has many times held that a municipality has only such power respecting the regulation and control of alcoholic beverages as is given it by the Legislature. See Singer v. Scarborough, 155 Fla. 357 , 20 So.2d 126 ; City of Miami v. Kichinko, 156 Fla. 128 , 22 So.2d 627 ; Fleeman v. Vocelle, 160 Fla. 898 , 37 So.2d 164 ."”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 64 So. 2d 670 - Makos v. Prince · 121 So. 2d 172 - City of Wilton Manors v. Starling

2. “establish zoning ordinances `restricting the location wherein a vendor licensed under § 561.34 may be permitted to conduct his place of business'”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 62 So. 2d 418 - Gross v. City of Miami · 66 So. 2d 807 - Lopez v. State

3. “"* * * And the Act also expressly reserves to the municipalities the right `to enact ordinances regulating the hours of business and location of places of business, and prescribing sanitary regulations therefor,' of any licensee under the Act. Section 562.45, Florida Statutes 1949 F.S.A. * * *"”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 129 So. 2d 696 - City of Miami Beach v. State Ex Rel. Pickin'Chicken of Lincoln Road, Inc.