Sultan & Chera Corp. v. Fallas’s Empirical Analysis
1952
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently November 2003
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Vonnegut Hardware Co. v. Rose · O'Brien v. Albert A. Albrecht Co. · Jendrus v. Detroit Steel Products Co. · Ramlow v. Moon Lake Ice Co. · Dollar v. Southern States Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"There can be no question that an injured employee will be denied compensation because of some disability which may be removed, or modified, by an operation of a simple character not involving serious suffering or danger of death ... "It is also well settled that when the operation is a serious one or a major operation and the injured party is informed of the nature of such operation and is generally afraid to undergo such operation, his refusal to submit will not defeat compensation." (p. 537)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.