Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

59 So. 3d 322

Cruz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2011-04-20

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2012

4 state decisions

Relies on Faretta v. California · 39 So. 3d 252 - State v. Montgomery · 982 So. 2d 1272 - Rodriguez v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2011-04-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1William Cruz appeals his conviction and sentence for attempted second degree murder. We reverse the conviction on each of two independently-sufficient grounds. First, the attempted voluntary manslaughter instruction, as given to the jury, violates the holding in State v. Montgomery, 39 So.3d 252 (Fla.2010).

¶2Second, we find that Cruz’s second demand to represent himself was unequivocally made, necessitating a Faretta1 hearing. Rodriguez v. State, 982 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). Because such a hearing was not conducted before the trial court denied Cruz’s demand, a reversal on this ground is also required.

¶3Reversed and remanded.

¶4. Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975).

/59/so3d/322 · .json · Public domain