Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 SW3D 468 - Cole v. Gilvin

Cole v. Gilvin’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Behrens v. Pelletier · Cadillac Products, Inc. v. Trienda Corp. · Kentucky State Racing Commission v. Fuller · Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Golightly · Uninsured Employers' Fund v. Garland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “II. STANDARD OF REVIEW [Because] this case was tried before the court without a jury, its factual findings shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge the credibility of the witnesses. A factual finding is not clearly erroneous if it is supported by substantial evidence. Substantial evidence is evidence of substance and relevant consequence sufficient to induce conviction in the minds of reasonable people. It is within the province of the fact-finder to determine the credibility of witnesses and the weight to be given the evidence. With respect to property title issues, the appropriate standard of review is whether the trial court was clearly erroneous or abused its discretion, and the appellate court should not substitute its opinion for that of the trial court absent clear error.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.